Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159000 (ALL)

JITENDRA KUMAR v. RAM LAKHAN

A227/5027/2025 · 2025-08-26

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5027 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking expeditious disposal of Regular Suit bearing No.41520/2014, pending before the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hawali, Lucknow. 3. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the matter has been pending since 2014 and an expedite order be passed. 4. Having considered the aforesaid submission and from perusal of the extracts of the order-sheet, which have been brought on record as Annexure- 2 to the petition, it would indicate that on many occasions, the defendant was responsible for delaying the proceedings. So much so, on several occasions, costs were also imposed. 5. The present petitioner, who has stepped into the shoes of his father, who was the original defendant, now claims that the matter be expedited. 6. Having considered this aspect in light of the extracts of the order-sheet, this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition at the behest of the present petitioner, leaving it open for him to move an appropriate application with an affidavit giving his undertaking that he shall not seek adjournment except in exceptional circumstances and in case if such an application is moved, the court concerned shall consider and pass appropriate orders thereon. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shresth Agarwal, Deepak Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Jitendra Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Ram Lakhan .....Respondent(s) 7. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. August 26, 2025 Shubhankar A227 No. 5027 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHANKAR THAKUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench