1 2025:CGHC:11300 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 161 of 2014 1 - Shyamlal S/o Janak Ram Aged About 72 Years R/o Kirari, P.S. Baradwar, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., Chhattisgarh 2 - Rajendra Kumar S/o Trilokinath Aged About 25 Years Legal Representative By Will, R/o Kirari, P.S. Baradwar, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Appellants versus 1 - Kaushilya Bai W/o Chetan Aged About 70 Years R/o Kirari, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., Chhattisgarh 2 - Kamal Bai D/o Chetan Aged About 45 Years W/o Girwar Rathore, R/o Raipur, Tah. And Distt. Raipur C.G., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Gouri Bai D/o Chetan Aged About 35 Years W/o Rajesh Rathore, R/o Balgi Nagar, Korba, Distt. Korba C.G., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh (wrongly mentioned as District Janjgir-Champa) 4 - (A) Ahilya Bai W/o Jhaduram aged (not mentioned) R/o Pasid, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh PRIYANKA VERMA Digitally signed by PRIYANKA VERMA Date: 2025.03.07 14:38:33 +0530 2 5 -(A) Udhoram S/o Radhelal Aged About 45 Years R/o Kirari, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh (B) Asil Bai W/o Leeladhar Aged About 47 Years R/o Nandaurkala Kirari, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh (C)Manmati Bai W/o Gendram Aged About 46 Years R/o Dumarpara, Tah. Sakti, P.S. Baradwar, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh (D)Malti Bai W/o Mahadev Aged About 46 Years R/o Kirari, Tah. Sakti, P.S. Baradwar, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh (E) Dashoda Bai W/o Aged About 30 Years R/o Kirari, Tah. Sakti, P.S. Baradwar, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 6- State Of Chhattisgarh W/o Thru- The Collector, Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir- Champa C.G., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Appellants : Mr. Ishwar Jaiswal, Advocate For State : Mr. S.K. Puria, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board 07/03/2025 1. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he tried his level best to contact the appellants, but received no response. Hence, he pleads no instruction in the present matter. 3 2. In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the Appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Priyanka