Rimmalapudi Amardeep, v. Rimmalapudi Vasanti Seetha Devi
TRCMP/140/2025 · 2025-08-21
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15899 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15899 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010205722025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO TRANS. CIVIL MISC.PETITION NO: 140/2025 Between:
1. RIMMALAPUDI AMARDEEP,, S/O. SUBBARAO,AGED 38 YEARS. BUSINESS, D.NO.4-98, NEAR KAMMAVARI RAMALAYAM, MACHAVARAM (V), RAYAVARAM (M), B.R.A. KONASEEMA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. RIMMALAPUDI VASANTI SEETHA DEVI, w/o Amardeep Housewife, Aged 31 years, F.No410,Block-A, Swama Twins, Siddhartha Nagar, Godarigunta, Kakinada District.
...RESPONDENT Petition Under Section 24 of the C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to order withdrawal of the petition H.M.O.P. No.287/2024 from the file of Court of Honble II Addl. Civil Judge(Senior Division), Kakinada and transfer the same to the court of Civil Judge( Senior Division), Ramachandrapuram, or any other court of competent Jurisdiction for trial and disposal of the same in accordance with law and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to order Stay of all further proceedings in H.M.O.P.
No.287/2024 on the file of Court of Hon’ble II Addl. Civil Judge(Senior Division) Court, Kakinada, pending disposal of the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition and to pas Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VARREY VENTAKATA NAGAVISHNU TEJA Counsel for the Respondent:
1. JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
1. Today, when the matter was listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, learned counsel appearing on both sides are present.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition and he also endorsed the same on the grounds of the bundle to that effect.
3. Permission is granted.
4. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Date.22.08.2025 CVD