Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 8962 of 2025 Decided on: 25.09.2025 Subash Chand ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & anr. ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner : Mr. Vinod Kumar Soni, Advocate, vice Mr. George, Advocate. For the Respondents/State : Mr. Jitender K. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Rakesh Kainthla,Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General, under instructions, submits that since the parole has been granted to the petitioner, hence, the instant petition has rendered infructuous. This fact has confirmed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In view of above, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 25th September, 2025. (Ravinder)