APHC010203872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHT DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 10733/2025 Between: M.V.Bhaskar Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANUBROLU SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I 2 HCGR, J W.P.No.10733 of 2025 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief/s:- “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to Declare the inaction of the Respondents Nos.1 and 2 on my representation Dated 7-4-2025 as illegal, arbitrary and Consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to issue all consequential benefits to the Petitioner for the period of termination to reinstatement and pass such other order or orders…” 2. Heard Sri M.Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Sri M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4. 3. Petitioner, while working as Technical Assistant/APO with 2nd respondent on contract basis, has been terminated from service on allegations of irregularities committed during his employment. The said termination came to be challenged in appeal before 2nd respondent, who confirmed the same on 17.08.2011. Petitioner further preferred W.P.No.26360 of 2011 before this Court assailing the aforesaid orders, which came to be allowed by an order dated 29.04.2022 remanding the matter back to respondents to conduct fresh inquiry. In pursuant to said re-inquiry, petitioner found to be not guilty of any of the charges. Therefore, he has been reinstated into service by proceedings dated 02.06.2023. However, he was not paid consequential benefits for the period of termination. Petitioner made representation dated 25.02.2025, to consider his case for extending 3 HCGR, J W.P.No.10733 of 2025 consequential benefits for the aforesaid period, which is stated to be pending. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would suffice to direct the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the said representation. 5. Sri M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4, submit that the said representation dated 25.02.2025, received on 07.04.2025, would be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. 6. In view of aforesaid submissions, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, with the consent of both the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage, directing the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of petitioner’s representation dated 25.02.2025, received on 07.04.2025, by passing speaking orders in accordance with law, within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Date: 28.04.2025 KBN