Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158968 (ALL)

VIKAS KUMAR RAI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1062/2025 · 2025-08-26

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1062 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Heard Shri Yogeshwar Sharan Srivastava, Learned Counsel for the applicant, and the learned Addl. Government Advocate, for the state. The applicant has filed this application seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No. 123 of 2025 under Sections 338, 336(2), 340(2), 318(2), B.N.S., P.S. Alambagh, District Lucknow. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press this anticipatory bail application, and the applicant shall appear before the trial court and seek his release on bail. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of by observing that in case the applicant appears before the trial court and seeks his release on bail, his bail application shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, keeping in view the principles of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI, (2022) 10 SCC 51. August 26, 2025 A.Nigam Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Yogeshwar Sharan Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Vikas Kumar Rai .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench