RAM ROOP v. U.P. JAL NIGAM (RURAL) LKO. THRU. ITS CHAIRMAN AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/9458/2025 · 2025-08-25
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158955 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158955 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9458 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Aditya Mohan, learned counsel, who files Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondents.
2. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties the matter is being decided finally.
3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner's father namely Sri Nand Lal, who was working as a Fitter under the respondents, died in harness on 27.09.2021. The petitioner staked his claim for compassionate appointment yet the respondents have failed to decide the same till date.
4. Responding learned counsel for the respondents states that there are other legal heirs also and the petitioner should submit No Objection Certificate from the other legal heirs so as to entail consideration of his claim for compassionate appointment in accordance with law.
5. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner submit an appropriate application along with No Objection Certificate from other legal heirs and in accordance with rules. In case such an application is submitted within a period of two weeks along with certified copy of this order then the competent authority who is said to be the Managing Director of the Corporation i.e. respondent no.2 shall consider the same in accordance with law and relevant rules which Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rishabh Kapoor Ram Roop .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Jal Nigam (Rural) Lko. Thru. Its Chairman And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
consideration would be made within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the application.
6. Needless to mention that respondent no.2 may require the petitioner to produce such other documents as may be required for processing of his claim which would also be submitted by the petitioner.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not entered into the merits of the case. August 25, 2025 A. Katiyar WRIA No. 9458 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench