DINESH CHANDRA v. AKHILESH KUMAR @ AKHAL AND ANOTHER
A227/4993/2025 · 2025-08-25
Jaspreet Singh
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158948 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158948 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4993 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. In light of the order proposed to be passed today, notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 is dispensed with.
3. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the learned trial court/Civil Judge (Junior Division), Dakshini, Unnao, for expeditious disposal of the interim injunction application dated 26.09.2017, filed by the plaintiff/petitioner in Original Suit No.443 of 2017 (Dinesh Chandra vs. Akhilesh Kumar).
4. It is submitted that the petitioner filed an interim injunction application on 26.09.2017 seeking relief in respect of the land in dispute, a copy of which is annexed as Annexure-3 to the petition. Despite issuance of notice to the respondents and the execution of a Commission to bring on record the actual spot possession, the said application remains undecided. Hence, the instant petition has been filed for expeditious disposal of the interim injunction application.
5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the writ petition pending. Rather, the ends of justice would be met by directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Dakshini, Unnao, to consider and decide the petitioner's pending interim injunction application dated 26.09.2017 in Original Suit No. 443 of 2017, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all parties, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, expeditiously and preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal imepdiment. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amresh Kumar Singh, Aviral Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Dinesh Chandra .....Petitioner(s) Akhilesh Kumar @ Akhal And Another .....Respondent(s)
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The trial court shall independently hear and decide the application in accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. August 25, 2025 Shubhankar A227 No. 4993 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHANKAR THAKUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench