HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4989 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Avinash Tripathi, learned counsel for as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that present writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed with a liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate authority for redressal of his grievances. 3. Learned Standing Counsel has not objection to the aforesaid submissions. 4. Accordingly, in view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. August 25, 2025 Ravi/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avinash Tripathi, Kaushalendra K. Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Smt. Ashok Awasthi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench