ANIL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. ENERGY LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/9619/2025 · 2025-09-01
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158937 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158937 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9619 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State and Shri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 to 4. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. The petitioner is aggrieved by the transfer order dated 11.06.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition, so far as it relates to the petitioner whereby he has been transferred from District Barabanki to District Amethi. Ground of challenge is that the petitioner is 40% physical disabled and is also undergoing dialysis at Lucknow.
Learned counsel for petitioner has raised various other grounds also to challenge the impugned transfer order. However, the Court is of the view that the said grounds fall in the realm of the grounds to be considered by the respondents at the first instance.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in this regard the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 18.06.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-8 to the petition, which has been forwarded by the letter dated 20.06.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-9 to the petition, and prays that the same may be
directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Counsels Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Umesh Chandra Tripathi, Rajan Mishra, Soumya Dixit Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ran Vijay Singh Anil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Energy Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
for the respondents have no objection. Considering the aforesaid the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the pending representation of the petitioner in accordance with law under relevant rules within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Till the decision on the representation, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner.
September 1, 2025 prateek WRIA No. 9619 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench