MANU MITTAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. JUDGE FAMILY COURT LKO. AND ANOTHER
A227/4964/2025 · 2025-08-22
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158929 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158929 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49311 Court No. - 17 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4964 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manu Mittal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Judge Family Court Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. Learned counsel for applicant has submitted that due to inadvertence description of one of the respondent parties has wrongly been described in the array of respondent and certain
facts as well as documents are left to be mentioned/incorporated along with the present contempt application, so the applicant may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt application with liberty to file the same afresh by annexing all the relevant documents and mentioning all the relevant facts.
2. As prayed, the present contempt application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh.
3. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the documents to the learned counsel for the petitioners while retaining photocopy of the same.
Order Date :- 22.8.2025 Ashish Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench