KAVITA DEVI v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND OTHERS
WRIB/810/2025 · 2025-09-01
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158926 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158926 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 810 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Yogesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner has field a revision against the order of Settlement Officer Consolidation dated 17.03.2025 before the Dy. Director of Consolidation. He submits that the Court is vacant due to which he is not able to press his application for interim relief and submits that there is urgency in the matter and consequently has approached this Court seeking a direction to the respondents to maintain status quo during pendency of the writ petition.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has informed this Court that only on 29.08.2025 posting has been made on the post of Dy. Director of Consolidation, Ambedkar Nagar and accordingly normal functioning of the court has already commenced.
5. In light of the above, this Court does not find any ground for keeping the present writ petition pending as the petitioner has already invoked the jurisdiction of revisional authority, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Dy. Director of Consolidation, Ambedkar Nagar to consider and decide the application for interim relief preferred along with his Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogesh Singh, Krinker Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Kavita Devi .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Ambedkar Nagar And Others .....Respondent(s)
Revision No. 20255404400000059 expeditiously, say, within a period of three weeks from the date, report regarding sufficiency of service is received with regard to the service on respondents and in case there is some legal impediment, it shall also be open for the petitioner to press for grant of ad interim relief in case the case is so made out. September 1, 2025 Ravi/ WRIB No. 810 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench