- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1815 WP No. 3655 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 3655 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI BASAVARAJU S/O LATE MARULAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/A HOUSE NO 95 RUSHABHALAYA SRI CHAKRA NAGAR ANDRAHALLI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU- 560091. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. LOKESH.K ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI B M DODDAIAH S/O MARAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT NO 1 1ST MAIN KALYANAGARA MOODALPALYA NAGARABHAVI BENGALURU 560072 2. HARISH KUMAR DODDAIAH SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS SMT KALAVATHI C W/O LATE HARISH KUMAR DODDAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1815 WP No. 3655 of 2022 3. KALYAN H PATIL S/O LATE HARISH KUMAR DODDAIAH AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS 4. HARI PRIYA H D/O LATE HARISH KUMAR DODDAIAH AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.3 & 4 ARE MINOR REP. BY THEIR MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT KALAVATHI C RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 4 R/AT NO 1, 1ST MAIN KALYANAGARA MOODALPALYA NHAGARABHAVI BENGALURU -560072 5. THE MAINTENANCE TRIBUNAL AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION 2ND FLOOR KANDAYA BHAVAN K G ROAD, BENGALURU- 560009 6. THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, KANDAYA BHAVAN K G ROAD, BENGALURU -560009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.LAKSHMIKANTH K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI.MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH., AGA FOR R5 & R6) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 04.06.2019, PASSED BY THE R5 IN CASE VIDE AT ANNEXURE-A SO FAR AS IT RELATED TO THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.24/5, MEASURING 0.10.04 GUNTAS (OUT OF 1 ACRE 5 GUNTAS), SITUATED AT BETTAHALLI VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU AND ETC. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1815 WP No. 3655 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER The petitioner and the learned Counsel for the petitioner have filed a memo dated 16.01.2025 stating that the Appellate Tribunal has set aside the impugned order and therefore, the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous. It is therefore prayed that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending I.As., if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL