APHC010205342021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.12897 OF 2021 Between: 1. S. Pudi Lakshmi Tejaswi,, Aged 22 years, S/o. S. Pudi Venkata Siva Rama Raju, R/o. D.No. 21-8-40, G.S. Raju Road, Mutyalam Padu, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh 522006. ...Petitioner AND 1. Dr NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Registrar. 2. The Vice Chancellor and Controller of Exams, Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh 3. Katuri Medical College, Chinakondrupadu, Guntur District, Rep by its Principal. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the 1st and 2nd Respondents in issuing proceedings F.No.2901/E1A/MBBS/MP/2021 dated 15.06.2021 awarding the punishment of disqualification to the Petitioner for a period of Six months including the examinations of November, SRK, J WP No.12897 of 2021 2 2020 as being illegal, arbitrary, and without jurisdiction and in violation of Articles 14, and 21 of the Constitution of India and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the said impugned proceedings in F.No.2901/E1A/MBBS/MP/2021 dated 15.06.2021 issued by the 1st and 2'd Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner: N ASHWANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GUTTAPALEM VIJAYA KUMAR (SC FOR Dr NTR HEALTH U) SRK, J WP No.12897 of 2021 3 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition has been filed questioning the proceedings of respondent No.2, dated 15.06.2021, awarding punishment of disqualifying the petitioner from prosecuting and appearing for exams in the MBBS Course for a period of six months. 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:31.07.2025 Nsr SRK, J WP No.12897 of 2021 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.12897 of 2021 Date:31.07.2025 Nsr