Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158866 (ALL)

AMIT KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/7619/2025 · 2025-09-11

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7619 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Ranjana Srivastava, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 2.In view of the order proposed to be passed, the notices to opposite party Nos.5 to 8 are hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(a) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party Nos.1 to 4 to conduct a fair and proper investigation in pursuance of First Information Report dated 03.06.2025, in Case Crime No.0126 of 2025, under Sections 108, 352 & 351(2) B.N.S., Police Station-Sohramau, District- Unnao, contained in Annexure No.1 to the writ petition, in the interest of justice. (b) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party Nos.1 to 3 to ensure the protection of life of the petitioner and his family members against the threat by the opposite party Nos.5 to 8, in the interest of justice." 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate has informed that the investigation is going on properly and uptil now 13 Parchas have been prepared and one accused, namely, Ramu has been arrested. Therefore, Ms. Srivastava has submitted that the Investigating Officer is discharging his duties properly and the investigation may likely be completed very soon. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Mishra, Dinesh Kumar Dixit, Laxmi Shanker Goswami, Vineet Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Amit Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 5. In the wake of the aforesaid development, we do not find it appropriate to keep this petition pending any longer. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage having expectation that the Investigating Officer may conduct and conclude the investigation, strictly in accordance with law. September 11,2025 Suresh/ CRLP No. 7619 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench