Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158863 (ALL)

SMT. SUJATA PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/4996/2025 · 2025-08-25

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4996 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rakesh Kuma Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 to decide the Case No. 4160 of 2022 Computerized Case NO. T202204680904160 (Smt. Sujata Pandey Vs. Smt. Jaykala), U/S 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Tehsildar Baldiraj, Pargana Barausa, District Sultanpur is directed to decide Case No. 4160 of 2022 Computerized Case No. T202204680904160 (Smt. Sujata Pandey Vs. Smt. Jaykala), U/S 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Sujata Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. August 25, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 4996 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench