- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11468 WP No. 3575 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 3575 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SUBRAMANIAN THIAGARAJAN AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O THIAGARAJAN DIRECTOR, SICAL LOGISTICS LIMITED, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.5, IIIRD FLOOR, NO.32, 92ND STREET, 18TH AVENUE, CHENNAI - 600 083. 2. SESHADRI RAJAPPAN AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, S/O SESHADRI DIRECTOR, SICAL LOGISTICS LIMITED, RESIDING AT: 1/488, WEST STREET, KOTTIVAKKAM, CHENNAI – 600 041. (SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED) …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. NITYA KALYANI P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. AXIS BANK LIMITED, HAVING ITS HEADQUARTERS AT 7TH FLOOR, C-2, WADIA INTERNATIONAL CENTRE, PANDURANG BUDHKAR MARG, WORLI, MUMBAI – 400 025. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11468 WP No. 3575 of 2022 AND LOCALLY AT: NITESH TIME SQUARE BUILDING, IIIRD FLOOR, LEVEL III, NO.8, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001. (REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR) 2. TRANSUNION CIBIL LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: ONE WORLD CENTER, 19TH FLOOR, TOWER 2A AND 2B, SENAPATI BAPAT MARG, LOWER PAREL MUMBAI CITY MH-400 013. (REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR) …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. DHIRENDERA N. KATTI, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. VELLANKI RAVI, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 FO THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO- DIRECT R1 AND R2 TO DELETE THE NAME OF THE PETITIONERS FROM THE LIST OF DEFAULTERS FORWARDED BY R1 AND ISSUED BY THE R2 ON 30.06.2021 AND 30.09.2021 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11468 WP No. 3575 of 2022 2. The memo reads as follows: “MEMO REPORTING DEATH OF PETITIONER NO.1 AND WITHDRAWAL The counsel for the Petitioners most humbly submits the death certificate reporting the unfortunate demise of Petitioner No.1 in the captioned matter. It submitted that petitioner No.2 is unwilling to proceed with the matter as well. Thereby, the matter maybe disposed as withdrawn in accordance in the interest of justice and equity.” In terms of the memo, the writ petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 4 Sl No.: 6 CT:PH