APHC010204652025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 10578 of 2025 Between: 1. JALASUTHRAM CHINA PARAMAIAH, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O.DOOR NO.2-44, BESIDES HANEEF APARTMENTS, KOTAPPA KONDA ROAD, NARASARAOPET TOWN, PALNADU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, LINGAMGUNTIA ROAD, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 3. PATTAN AZEEZ, S/O.MAHABOOB, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT IN DR.NO.12-13-4/14, PRAKASHNAGAR, NARASARAOPETA TOWN, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issues a writ order or direction more particular in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent who is trying to dispossess the petitioner from the schedule property is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and hence may kindly direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to resist the illegal activities of the 3rd respondent with evil elements to dispossess the petitioner from the schedule property and also may direct the 3rd respondent to fallow the due process of law in respect of decree in injunction suit passed by the Honble PrI.Junior Civil Judge Court Narasaraopet in O.S No.505/2021 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SESHAGIRI RAO ULLAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.....to issues a writ order or direction more particular in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent who is trying to dispossess the petitioner from the schedule property is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and hence may kindly direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to resist the illegal activities of the 3rd respondent with evil elements to dispossess the petitioner from the schedule property and also may direct the 3rd respondent to fallow the due process of law in respect of decree in injunction suit passed by the Honble PrI.Junior Civil Judge Court Narasaraopet in O.S No.505/2021 and pass such ....” 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent/State. Perused the material on record. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State on written instructions dated 01.05.2025, would submit that respondent No.3 filed a suit against the Petitioner herein vide OS No.27 of 2010 on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Narasaraopet and vide Order dated the said suit was dismissed against the Petitioner on the ground that the Petitioner is not in possession of the property and he has no title and the appeal filed by the Petitioner herein was also dismissed by this Court. Further, Petitioner herein filed a suit in OS No.22 of 2022 on the file of the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge, Narasaraopet against respondent No.3 and the said suit was dismissed on 05.12.2024. Further, Petitioner and his family 3 members without having any right, interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of respondent No.3. Respondent No.3 also filed a suit in OS No.505 of 2021 on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Narasaraopet and the said suit was decreed in favour of respondent No.3 declaring that petitioner has neither in possession nor title over the suit schedule property. In the said suit Police aid was also granted to respondent No.3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the wife of the Petitioner herein filed a complaint which was forwarded to the Station House Officer, Narasaraopet II Town Police Station for enquiry. During enquiry, respondent authorities recorded the statements of the neighbours which reveal that there are civil disputes between the parties and with all false allegations, the present complaint is filed by the wife of the Petitioner against respondent No.3 and prays that this Court may pass appropriate orders by this disposing of this Writ Petition. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petitions No. 10578 of 2025 12.08.2025 Mjl /*