M/S Vikash KUMAR SAHU A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/1687/2025 · 2025-04-04
Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15879 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15879 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:15916 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1687 of 2025 1 - M/s Vikash Kumar Sahu A Sole Proprietorship Firm Through Its Proprietor Vikash Kumar Sahu, S/o Late Chandra Kishore Sahu, Aged About 52 Years, R/o A - 15 - 18, Chouhan Green Valley, Junwani, P.S. Supela, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Municipal Corporation Bhilai Through Its Commissioner, District Durg Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from CIS System) For Petitioner : Mr. Shobhit Koshta Advocate. For State : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 04/04/2025
1. The writ petition has been filed only for a direction to the respondents for clearance of all undisputed and admitted dues of the petitioner in respect of the work executed by the petitioner vide work order dated 12.09.2018 arising out of a tender for construction of drainage and C.C. cement road construction in Ward No. - 2, various places of Pushpak Nagar. Digitally signed by SHAYNA KADRI
2
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents also have in fact meanwhile processed the claim of the petitioner, but thereafter there has been no further development so far as releasing of the dues are concerned. He further submits that till date there has been no dispute whatsoever raised by the respondents in respect of the quantity and the quality of the work completed by the petitioner
3. Learned counsel for the Corporation appearing on advance notice submits that subject to due verification and scrutiny of the claim of the petitioner, appropriate steps shall be taken at the earliest within a period of 60 days
4. Given the statement made by the counsel for the Corporation, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of directing the respondent No. 2 to ensure that the admitted undisputed dues of the petitioner in respect of the work executed by the petitioner from the work order dated 12.09.2018 is cleared within an outer limit of 60 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.
5. With the aforesaid observation(s), the present petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Shayna Judge