Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158778 (ALL)

VED PRAKASH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1060/2025 · 2025-08-21

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49193 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1060 of 2025 Applicant :- Ved Prakash Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arti Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Ms. Arti Shukla, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Nagarjun Pandey, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No.218 of 2024, under Sections 3/5/8 of U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, registered at Police Station Tarun, District Ayodhya/Faizabad. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged by a Sub Inspector of Police on 11.07.2024 against three accused persons, not including the applicant stating that on the basis of an information received from a mukhbir it was found that three persons were loading cow progenies on a pick up vehicle. Upon seeing the police two persons escaped and one person Rajesh Yadav was arrested. The pick up vehicle did not bear any registration number plat. During investigation it came to light that the vehicle belongs to the applicant and therefore the applicant has been made an accused in the present case. 4. The co-accused Jhinkan has been granted regular bail by this court by means of an order dated 10.01.2025, passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.227 of 2025. 5. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the facts of the case do not warrant exercise of discretion of this court by granting pre arrest bail to the applicant. The anticipatory bail application is accordingly rejected. 6. In case the applicant appears before the trial court and seeks his release on regular bail, his bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law without being influence by this court. . (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 21.8.2025 Ram. Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench