Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158762 (ALL)

M/S J.S.B.ENTERPRISES THRU. SUMIT KHANDELWAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF SECONDARY EDUCATION LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/8138/2025 · 2025-08-26

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8138 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sarvesh Kumar Dubey, Advocate appearing on behalf of the opposite parties no. 4 & 5 and learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 4 and 5 directing them to execute agreement in favour of the petitioner under the scheme to increase the income of aided/recognized schools for the maintenance of the school buildings and provide the possession of lawn and Chandra Bhanu Gupa Auditorium at National Inter College, 2, Rana Pratap Marg, Hazratganj, Lucknow for marriage ceremonies. (ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no.4 and 5 directing them to consider and decide the representation dated 22.01.2025 given by the petitioner contained as Annexure No. 8 to the writ petition." 3. At the outset, Sri Sarvesh Kumar Dubey, Advocate appeared on behalf of the opposite parties no.4 & 5, on the basis of instructions from his client, says that the notification dated 29.07.2024 has been withdrawn and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sunil Kumar Mishra, Atul Kumar Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. M/S J.S.B.Enterprises Thru. Sumit Khandelwal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Secondary Education Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) notice regarding the same has been published in the newspaper, a copy of which has been produced before this Court. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, says that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh in case a fresh cause of action arose. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. August 26, 2025 Darpan Sharma WRIC No. 8138 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench