NIRMAL KUMAR SHARMA ALIAS NIRMAL KANDPAL v. NIDHI PANDEY
FA/79/2024 · 2025-11-18
Alok Mahra, Ravindra Maithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15876 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15876 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS S1- 04
FA No.79 of 2024 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Saurav Adhikari, Advocate for the respondent. On 18.11.2025, in this first appeal, on behalf of the appellant, it was submitted that since parties have amicably settled the dispute, the appellant does not want to pursue with the case. Accordingly, the appeal was disposed of. Now, Modification Application, MCC No.2 of 2025, has been the filed on the ground that, in fact, parties have entered into an agreement on 08.12.2025, and they have dissolved their marriage; the appellant has paid Rs. 31 Lakhs to the respondent; the settlement deed has been filed as Annexure No.1 to the modification application. The appellant is present in person before the Court and the respondent has joined the proceedings through video conferencing, as identified by their respective counsel. They have verified the settlement deed, which is part of Annexure No.1 to the modification application. Both the appellant and the respondent submit that they have mutually settled the dispute; the respondent admits that she has received Rs. 31 Lakhs from the appellant; both have admitted that they have decided to dissolve their marriage. The settlement deed, which is part of Annexure No.1 to the modification application, shall form part of the order dated
18.11.2025. The modification application stands disposed of, accordingly. The marriage between the parties stands dissolved, accordingly.
(Alok Mahra J.) (Ravindra Maithani J.)
16.12.2025 RV