2025:JHHC:26592 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.3246 of 2024 .... 1. Pawan Kumar Gupta, aged about-29 years, S/O Ganesh Prasad, R/O-Village Palihari, Gurudih, P.O.-Gomia, P.S.-Gomia, District-Bokaro (Jharkhand) 2. Nisha, aged about 26 years, D/O-Arvind, R/O-Village-Nand Nagri, P.O.-Nand Nagri, P.S.-Seemapuri, District-Shahdura, Delhi 3. Anand Kumar Verma, aged about-26 years, S/O-Tarkeshwar Prasad Verma, R/O- Village Dabri, P.O.-Dabri, P.S.-Birni, District-Giridih (Jharkhand) 4. Dheeraj Kumar, aged about 25 years, S/O-Gopal Thakur, R/O Village-Charaun, P.O.-Nawagarhi, P.S.-Nawagarhi, District-Munger (Bihar) 5. Anju Kumari, aged about 29 years, D/O-Mahendra Yadav, R/O-Village-Kewla, P.O.-Manjhgawan, P.S.-Padma, District-Hazaribag (Jharkhand) 6. Ankit Kumar, aged about 30 years, S/O-Arvind Kumar, R/O Qtr, No.-DT461, Sharma Road, Dhurwa, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, (Jharkhand) 7. Jitendra Nath Mahato, aged about 36 Years, S/O-Mihir Chandra Mahato, R/O- Village-Keliya Dabar, P.O.-Pindrajora, P.S.-Chas, District-Bokaro (Jharkhand) 8. Iltaf Ansari, aged about 26 years, S/O-Kabeddin Ansari, R/O-Ward No.2 Unchari, P.O.-Garhwa, P.S.-Garhwa, District-Garhwa (Jharkhand) 9. Pradip Kumar Mahapatra, aged about 30 years, S/O-Nandkishor Mahapatra, R/O- Village-Belsiyangarh, P.O.-Rania, P.S.-Rania, District-Khunti, (Jharkhand) .… Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, Dist.-Ranchi 2. The Jharkhand Public Service Commission through the Secretary, Circular Road, P.O.-Lalpur, P.S. Lalpur, Dist.-Ranchi 3. The Chairman, Jharkhand Public Service Commission, Circular Road, P.O.-Lalpur, P.S. Lalpur, Dist.-Ranchi 4. The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Public Service Commission, Circular Road, P.O.-Lalpur, P.S. Lalpur, Dist.-Ranchi .... Respondents .... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioners : Mr. Niraj Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the State : Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, AC to GA-V .... 04/02.09.2025 1. On instruction of the client, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the other side has raised no objection. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Shahid/ uploaded