Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15876 (CHH)

SAMARU YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPL/106/2019 · 2025-04-28

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:19038 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPL No. 106 of 2019 • Samaru Yadav S/o Shri Konda Yadav Aged About 54 Years R/o Village Cherkabhata, Post- Bhaisakshar, Tehsil- Kota, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Labour Commissioner, Labour Department, Office Of The Labour Commissioner, Block-3, 2nd Floor, Indravati Bhavan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Deputy Labour Commissioner (DLC) Office Of The Labour Commissioner, Block-3, 2nd Floor, Indravati Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, Through Commissioner, Nagar Palika Nigam Office, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4. Garden-In-Chanrge Nagar Palika Nigam, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 & 2/ State For Respondents No. 3 & 4 : : Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 28/04/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 “10.1 To allow the instant petition and issue appropriate writ/order/judgment directing the Respondent No. 2 to decide the application of the petitioner dated 11/08/2017 (received on 15/09/2017) under Section 34 of the ID Act, 1947 (ANNEXURE P/1) in accordance with law and as per provisions of ID Act, 1947 within a period of 30 days. 10.2 To grant any other relief(s) / order(s) / direction(s) in favour of petitioner, which may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.” 2. At the very outset, Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Recording the statement made by Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti