Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158752 (ALL)

SMT. ASHA TIWARI v. SMT. INDU MISHRA AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/8130/2025 · 2025-08-26

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8130 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State Respondents and Sri Sanjeev Singh, Advocate, who has filed power on behalf of the respondent no.2- I.C.I.C.I. Bank. 2. This petition has been filed praying for a permanent injunction to the respondents to allow her to remain in possession of property mentioned in paragraph-2 of the writ petition and the order passed by the Additional City Magistrate, VIIth Lucknow dated 15.07.2025 be kept in abeyance. 3. We have gone through the order dated 15.07.2025, which has been issued by the Additional City Magistrate as aforesaid in compliance of the order passed by the Additional District Magistrate (Administration), Lucknow, in Case No.202410460000913 under Section 14 of the S.A.R.F.A.E.S.I. Act in ICICI Bank Ltd Vs. Smt. Indu Mishra and others, on 11.02.2025. The order of the Additional City Magistrate only directs the actual delivery of physical possession after order under Section 14 has been passed by the District Magistrate/ Additional District Magistrate (Administration) as aforesaid. 4. The writ petition is not maintainable. It is dismissed as such, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prashant Kumar Smt. Asha Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Indu Mishra And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) leaving it open for the petitioner to approach the appropriate Forum. August 26, 2025 Rahul WRIC No. 8130 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench