PRAMOD KUMAR TRIPATHI v. THE COURT OF LEARNED TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL KAISARGANJ, BAHRAICH AND OTHERS
A227/4953/2025 · 2025-08-22
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158723 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158723 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49422 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4953 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Tripathi Respondent :- The Court Of Learned Tehsildar, Tehsil Kaisarganj, Bahraich And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shubham Gupta,Suresh Kumar Singh,Vineet Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondent is dispensed with.
3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India prayer has been made for direction to respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Kaisarganj, District - Bahraich, for expeditious disposal of application dated 18.06.2025, filed in Case No. 6685 of 2024 - Village Pandhayat Baheliya Vs. Hanoman, under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Kaisarganj, District - Bahraich, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Court concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of application dated 18.06.2025, filed in Case No. 6685 of 2024 - Village Pandhayat Baheliya Vs. Hanoman, under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the Court/Authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioner, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the Court concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 22.8.2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench