Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158712 (ALL)

SACHIN SINGH ALIAS AMAR SINGH RATHOR (ACTUAL NAME SACHIN SINGH) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/7803/2025 · 2025-08-25

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49741 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7803 of 2025 Applicant :- Sachin Singh Alias Amar Singh Rathor (Actual Name Sachin Singh) Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Dinesh Kumar Mishra, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Manish Vikram Singh Chauhan, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 346 of 2024, under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) B.N.S, registered at Police Station Wazirganj, District Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of F.I.R. lodged on 28.11.2024 against four named persons, not including the applicant and an unknown woman, stating that the informant had purchased a registered plot of land through a registered sale deed on 14.08.1998. A sale deed in respect of the informant's plot, was executed by some impostor on 22.11.2024 in favour of co-accused persons Sarvesh Kumar Gautam and Sangeeta Shaw. 4. During investigation, it came to light that the applicant was involved in hatching a conspiracy for execution of the sale deed in respect of the informant’s land by some impostor. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 6. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant's involvement in two other criminal cases of similar nature has been disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of the application, in which the applicant has been granted bail by means of orders dated 01.08.2025 and 07.08.2025 passed by the Coordinate Bench of of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 7151 of 2025 and 7154 of 2025, respectively. He has further submitted that the purchasers- co-accused Sarvesh Kumar Gautam and Sangeeta Shaw have already filed a suit for cancellation of the sale deed immediately after coming to know that the sale deed had been executed by some impostor. 7. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the anticipatory bail application and he has submitted that the investigation of the present case is still going on. 8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R; a suit for cancellation of the sale deed has already been filed; that the allegation against the applicant is being involved in the conspiracy for commission of the offence and there is no allegation that the applicant has received any monetary transactions and that the applicant has already been granted bail in two other criminal cases of similar nature, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9. Let the applicant- Sachin Singh Alias Amar Singh Rathor be released on bail in aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: - (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 25.8.2025 Preeti. Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench