HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7597 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard Sri Shravan Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.N. Tilhari, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State- opposite party Nos.1 to 3. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, the notices to opposite party Nos.4 to 8 are hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite party Nos.2 & 3 to conclude a fair and impartial investigation to consider the original fact of the occurrence with the case registered as Case Crime No.80 of 2025, under Sections 103(1) and 238(B) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Police Station-Raunahi, District- Ayodhya dated 25.03.2025, as contained in Annexure No.1 to the writ petition. (ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite party Nos.2 & 3 to arrest the accused and others in the aforesaid case crime." 4. Sri Tilhari, learned Additional Government Advocate has produced a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shravan Kumar, Ajeet Kumar, Kuldeep Kumar, Ramesh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Bhagavata .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Civil Sectt., Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) copy of the instructions letter dated 06.09.2025 provided by Sri Abdul Rehman Khan, Inspector Crime/ Investigating Officer, Police Station- Raunahi, District-Ayodhya addressing to the learned Government Advocate, High Court, Lucknow. The same is taken on record. 5. As per the aforesaid instructions, the investigation has been completed in the aforesaid case crime number and the final report has been filed before the court concerned. 6. On that, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that he is not aware about the aforesaid fact. He has further submitted that if the final report has been filed before the court concerned, the petitioner may be permitted to approach the appropriate court of law. 7. Be that as it may, it is always open for the petitioner to take appropriate steps before the competent court of law if the final report has been filed, but the relief so prayed in the writ petition, may not be granted at this stage. 8. Accordingly, the writ petition is consigned to record. September 12, 2025 Suresh/ CRLP No. 7597 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench