Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15871 (RAJ)

SMT. RAJNI S/O SHRI SARWAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5247/2025 · 2025-08-21

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:33056] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5247/2025 Smt. Rajni S/o Shri Sarwan Kumar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Neel Arnia, P.s. Mehandvas District Tonk, Presently Residence Of House No. H-97 A Siddharth Nagar, Police Station Airport, Jaipur. (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girraj P. Sharma with Ms. Sneha Gulati, Ms. Nikita Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 21/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.64/2025 registered at Police Station Jaipur Airport, District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Section 8/21 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the charge-sheet against the petitioner has already been submitted. The other co-accused Shravan Kumar has already been enlarged on bail. The role of the petitioner is not distinguishable from the case of the other co-accused. The alleged quantity of the smack is less than commercial quantity. It is [2025:RJ-JP:33056] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5247/2025] further contended that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 09.04.2025 and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the accused-petitioner is a habitual offender and against her, 9 cases were registered under various offences and out of 9 cases, 3 cases are under NDPS Act, therefore, considering the conduct of the petitioner, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Considering the fact that the alleged quantity of recovered contraband article from the petitioner is below commercial quantity and the other co-accused has already been enlarged on bail and the petitioner being a lady and is in custody since 09.04.2025 and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Smt. Rajni S/o Shri Sarwan Kumar, in connection with FIR No.64/2025 registered at Police Station Jaipur Airport, District Jaipur City (East), shall be enlarged on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for her [2025:RJ-JP:33056] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5247/2025] appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark her presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/51