Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15871 (JHR)

SIDDIQUE ANSARI ALIAS SIDDIK ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5342/2025 · 2025-07-07

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:18070 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5342 of 2025 ------ Siddique Ansari @ Siddik Ansari, aged about 23 years, son of Nawab Miya, resident of Village-Patrodih, P.O. & P.S.- Narayanpur, Dist.-Jamtara … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Kaushal K. Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 07.07.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jamtara (Cyber) Crime P.S. Case No.11 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 111(2)(ii) /317(2) /318(4)/ 319(2)/ 338/ 336(3)/ 340(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B/66C/66D of I.T. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that only because three mobile phones with SIM Cards were recovered from the petitioner, hence the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is also submitted that there is no money trail involved in this case. Drawing attention of this court towards para-16 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 12.02.2025 as is evident from para-15 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 11.06.2025 in B.A. No.3868 of 2025. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be also released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Spl. Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara (Cyber) Crime P.S. Case No.11 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/