BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Special Original Jurisdiction Wednesday, the Nineteenth day of March Two Thousand and Twenty Five PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN WMP(MD). No.19611 of 2024 in WP(MD).NO.16470 OF 2024 Thirukumaran S/o. Mayandi Thevar ... Petitioner/3rd party Vs 1 Perumal S/o Gopal Poyan ... Respondent No.1/Petitioner 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Palani Dindigul District. 3 The Tahsildar Vedasanthur Taluk Dindigul District. 4 The Village Administration Officer Nallamanarkottai Village Vedasanthur Taluk Dindigul District. 5 The Land Surveyor Nallamanarkottai Village Vedasanthur Taluk Dindigul District. ... Respondent No.2 to5/Respondents https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Prayer in WMP(MD).No.19611 of 2024 :- This Writ Miscellaneous Petition is filed Under Article 226 of the constitution of India, to permit the petitioner to file this re-call petition and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of this case and thus render justice. Prayer in WP(MD).No.16470 of 2024 :- This Writ Petition is filed Under Article 226 of the constitution of India,issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 to 4 measure demarcate the lands in Survey Nos. 526/1 having an extent of 12 acres, 527/2 having an extent of 50 ares,528/2 having an extent of 12 ares,529/1A having an extent of 1 hectare and 8.50 ares and 529/2 having an extent of 28 ares which situate at Nallamanarkottai village, Vedasanthur Taluk, Dingigul District based on the payments made by the petitioner in Challan No.20220516002030 dated 16.05.2022 which was submitted along with his representation ORDER:- This Wit Miscellaneous Petition coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Dr.R.Alagumani, Advocate for the Petitioner and of.M/s.M.Benazir Begum For R1, M/s.K.Balasubramanian, Special Government Pleader For Respondents 2 to R5, this Court made the following order: The order dated 23.07.2024 made in W.P.(MD)No.16470 of 2024 adequately protects the rights of the petitioner in this miscellaneous petition. It is stated that the authority has scrupulously adhered to the directions given by this Court. Merely because, an injunction suit has been filed by petitioner herein, that would not https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis foreclose the patta holder from calling upon the authorities to conduct survey. It is always open to the petitioner herein to obtain an injunction order against the writ petitioner. If the petitioner obtains an injunction order against the writ petitioner, then survey cannot be conducted. So long as the petitioner has not obtained restraint order, the patta holder cannot be prevented from having survey conducted. 2.With the aforesaid observation, this miscellaneous petition is dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS II) // True Copy // /03/2025 Sub Assistant Registrar (CS- I/ II / III / IV) TO 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer Palani, Dindigul District. 2. The Tahsildar Vedasanthur Taluk Dindigul District. 3. The Village Administration Officer Nallamanarkottai Village Vedasanthur Taluk Dindigul District. 4. The Land Surveyor Nallamanarkottai Village Vedasanthur Taluk Dindigul District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5.The Special Govt. Pleader, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai ORDER DATED : 19/03/2025 ========================== ORDER ========================== WMP(MD). No.19611 of 2024 IN WP(MD).NO.16470 OF 2024 Giving direction and etc. as stated within. MGJ(28.03.2025) 4P 6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17.07.2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis