[2025:RJ-JP:20833] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 977/2025 Santosh Son Of Mangal Ram, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Village Torda Police Station Bahatukalan, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present In Central Jail Alwar) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p 2. Roop Singh Son Of Shri Panniram Meena, Resident Of Toda, Bahatukalan (Devi Dholagarh) District Alwar (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Sunda For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG Mr. Sanjay Yadav HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 16/05/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0347/2024 registered at Police Station-Laxmangarh (Alwar), District-Alwar for the offences under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 140(1), 324(6), 303(2) and 109(1) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no overt act assigned to him in the FIR as well as statement made by the injured and other supporting witnesses [2025:RJ-JP:20833] (2 of 2) [CRLAS-977/2025] during the investigation. He further submits that as per interrogation report of the petitioner-Santosh, he was driving the magnet Car and except it no specific act was assigned to him even in the FIR or in the prosecution story. It is only other co-accused, who have caused injuries to the injured Kedar Singh. Charge- sheet has been filed. The petitioner is behind the Bar since 26.12.2024. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application and have submitted that as per material evidence available on record, the petitioner is involved in the so called incident. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Santosh Son Of Mangal Ram shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/321