Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15865 (KAR)

MRS SUDHADEVI v. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD

WP/29316/2017 · 2025-01-10

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1041 WP No. 29316 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 29316 OF 2017 (GM-KIADB) BETWEEN: MRS. SUDHADEVI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, W/O SRI. G.KARUNAKARAN, PROPRIETRIX, M/S SHIVA TECHNOLOGY, NO.1859, OFFICERS MODEL COLONY, T. DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 057. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. LAL KISHAN.N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. G.S.BHAT., ADVOCATE) AND: KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, (A GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA UNDERTAKING). NO.49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOORS, EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ASHOK.N.NAYAK., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1041 WP No. 29316 of 2017 ORAL ORDER Sri.Lal Kishan., counsel on behalf of Sri.G.S.Bhat., for the petitioner and Sri.Ashok N.Nayak., counsel for the respondent have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to fix Rs.36,91,000/- as a total price of the allotted land and take steps to handover possession of the allotted land within thirty days from the date of receipt of the balance amount. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. Suffice it to note that the representation made by the petitioner was placed before the 347th Board meeting on 04.02.2017 and the Board has confirmed the land cost at Rs.150 Lakhs and the same has been intimated to the petitioner. The decision of the Board meeting and the resolution cannot be questioned by filing a Writ Petition. Moreover, the relief sought by the petitioner also cannot be considered under - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1041 WP No. 29316 of 2017 the writ jurisdiction. The Writ Petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. 5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 26