MAMTA CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. BAL VIKAS EVAM PUSHTAHAR LKO AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/9299/2025 · 2025-08-20
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158637 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158637 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48664 Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9299 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mamta Chaudhary Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Bal Vikas Evam Pushtahar Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anumesh Mishra,Awadhesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties 1, 2, and 4. In view of the order being passed, notice to opposite party No.5 stands dispensed with. Petition has been filed challenging final select list, whereby opposite party No. 5, Laxmina, wife of Ramvilas, has been selected on the post of Anganwadi worker in the village concerned. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the basis of instructions, submits that inadvertently, paragraph 7 of the government order dated 21st March 2023 has been omitted to be challenged. He therefore seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh to effect challenge to the said order. Considering such a prayer made, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 prabhat Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench