Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 158632 (MAD)

A.RAMAKRISHNAN v. THE GOVT. OF TAMILNADU

WP(MD)/22798/2016 · 2025-07-15

S Sounthar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.22798 of 2016 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.07.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR W.P.(MD)No.22798 of 2016 and W.M.P.(MD)No.16305 of 2016 A.Ramakrishnan ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Housing & Urban Development Department, Fort. St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer, Ramanathapuram Housing Unit (TNHB), Ramanathapuram. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Declaration, declaring that the land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act 1894 in respect of the land of an extent of 8.18 cents comprised (plot No's.9, 10) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.22798 of 2016 in Survey No.332/5 situated at Pattinamkathan Village, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District, belonging to the petitioner, as lapsed in view of the Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act 30/2013) and to pay compensation as per new Act. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.A.Baskaran Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2 Mr.S.Sumesh Standing Counsel for R3 ORDER The Writ Petition is filed seeking a declaration that Land Acquisition Proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in respect of the petitioner's land in Survey No.332/5 in Pattinamkathan Village, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District, deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and to pay compensation as per new Act. 2. When the matter came up for hearing on 08.07.2025, the learned counsel for the petitioner reported 'no instructions'. Recording the same, 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.22798 of 2016 the Registry was directed to remove the name of the learned counsel for the petitioner and list the matter by printing the name of the petitioner. Today, the Writ Petition is listed by printing the name of the petitioner. There is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Writ Petition stands dismissed for default. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. 15.07.2025 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No csm To 1.The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Housing & Urban Development Department, Fort. St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.22798 of 2016 S.SOUNTHAR, J. csm Order made in W.P.(MD)No.22798 of 2016 and W.M.P.(MD)No.16305 of 2016 Dated : 15.07.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis