ARUN KUMAR DIXIT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/9331/2025 · 2025-08-21
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158630 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158630 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49136
Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9331 of 2025 Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Dixit Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,O.P. Tiwari Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1 and Sri O.P.Tiwari, Advocate who has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondents no. 2 & 3 which is taken on record. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.2 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1 and Sri O.P.Tiwari, Advocate have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.2 then the respondent No.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case.
Order Date :- 21.8.2025 Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench