SUNIL CHAUDHARY ALIAS DHANANJAY CHAUDHARY ALIAS DHULLU CHAUDHARY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4652/2025 · 2025-06-17
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15863 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15863 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:15978 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4652 of 2025
------ Sunil Chaudhary @ Dhananjay Chaudhary @ Dhullu Chaudhary, aged about 34 years, Son of Late Jawahir Chaudhari, Resident of Village –Kumbhi Khurd, P.O. –Nawa Bazar, P.S. –Bishrampur, District –Palamau.
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kr. No.2, Advocate For the State
: Mrs. Ruby Pandey, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 17.06.2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Ramkanda P.S. Case No.29 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and from the possession of the petitioner two country made pistol, eight live cartridges and money was recovered. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and no witnesses have been examined so far. It is then submitted that the petitioner has not been put on Test Identification Parade even though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.09.2024, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 11 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Garhwa, in connection with Ramkanda P.S. Case No.29 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu-Gunjan/