SHAMBHU MISHRA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/4922/2025 · 2025-08-20
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158602 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158602 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48809 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4922 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shambhu Mishra And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhand Pratap Singh,Manish Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Akhand Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondent is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide interim relief application filed in Appeal No. 443 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. C202504000000443) - Shambhu Mishra and Others Vs. Pankaj Tiwari, U/S 331(3) of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950 read with Order 43 Rule 1(D) of the CPC, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 2 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, is directed to decide the interim relief application filed in Appeal No. 443 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. C202504000000443) - Shambhu Mishra and Others Vs. Pankaj Tiwari, U/S 331(3) of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950 read with Order 43 Rule 1(D) of the CPC, expeditiously, say within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of service report regarding service of notice upon private respondents therein, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case/application and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench