VIKASH KUMAR SAW ALIAS VIKASH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./3156/2025 · 2025-06-10
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15860 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15860 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:14927
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3156 of 2025
Vikas Kumar Saw @ Vikash Kumar, S/o Manoj Saw, R/o village- Sri Ram Nagar, PO and PS: Dhansar, District Dhanbad (Jharkhand) ….. Petitioner (s)
Versus The State of Jharkhand ….OP(s).
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sah, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Amrita Kumari, APP
-----
02/10.06.2025: This is an application filed by the petitioner praying for grant of anticipatory bail in terms of sections 482 and 484 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, as the petitioner has been allegedly implicated in connection with Dhansar P.S. Case No. 27 of 2025 for the offences punishable under sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(3) of BNS and 27, 25 (1-B), 26, 35 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhanbad.
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.
3.
The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
4.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is case and counter case between the parties as mother of the petitioner has lodged an FIR against the informant prior to lodging of this case.
5.
The learned APP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner along with four others armed with deadly weapon had entered into the house of informant and had assaulted her brother.
6.
Since there is involvement of this petitioner in assaulting the brother of the informant, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7.
Hence, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed.
(ANANDA SEN, J. ) KNR/