Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15857 (KAR)

M SRIPATHI HEBBAR v. TUMKUR GRAIN MERCHANTS CO OP BANK LTD

WP/3342/2021 · 2025-01-07

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:395 WP No. 3342 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 3342 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. M.SRIPATHI HEBBAR S/O NARAYANA HEBBAR, AGED 60 YEARS, NO 279, 4TH PHASE, 4TH MAIN, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, BANGALORE-560 058. 2. M/S MAANJIL INDUSTRIES, PLOT NO 279, 4TH PHASE, 4TH MAIN, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, BANGALORE-560 058, REPRESNETED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, M.SRIPATHI HEBBAR, S/O NARAYANA HEBBAR, AGED 60 YEARS. 3. M/S FLYTECH ENGINEERS PVT LTD., PLOT NO 279, 4TH PHASE, 4TH MAIN, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, BANGALORE-560 058, REPRESNETED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, M.SRIPATHI HEBBAR, S/O NARAYANA HEBBAR, AGED 60 YEARS. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M.SUDHAKAR PAI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. TUMKUR GRAIN MERCHANTS CO-OP BANK LTD., ADMIN OFFICE, B.H.ROAD, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:395 WP No. 3342 of 2021 TUMKUR-572 103, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER. 2. ASHA HEBBAR MAJOR, W/O SRIPATHI HEBBAR, NO 279, 4TH PHASE, 4TH MAIN, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, BANGALORE-560 058. 3. BRIJESH HEBBAR MAJOR, S/O SRIPATHI HEBBAR, NO.279, 4TH PHASE, 4TH MAIN, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, BANGALORE-560 058. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.V.LOKESH., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1; NOTICE TO R2 & 3-DISPENSED WITH V/O DT:18.02.2021) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.M.Sudhakar Pai., counsel for the petitioners has appeared through video conferencing. Counsel Sri.M.Sudhakar.B., submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:395 WP No. 3342 of 2021 When queried, counsel Sri.M.Sudhakar.B., submits that a conscious submission is made about the infructuous of the petition. The oral submission made by counsel Sri.M.Sudhakar.B., is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 3 Sl No.: 59