Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48989 Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9341 of 2025 Petitioner :- Priyanka Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Bal Vikas Evam Pustahar Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gajendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties no.1 to 6. 2. In view of order being passed, notice to opposite party no.7 stands dispensed with. 3. Petition has been filed challenging appointment of opposite party no.7, Smt. Puja Verma W/o Uday Shankar as Aganbadi Worker in the centre concerned. 4. Learned State Counsel, however, on the basis of instruction submits that petitioner had applied under the above poverty line category whereas opposite party no.7 has been selected under the below poverty line category. 5. Learned counsel for petitioner in response thereto submits that the Income Certificate of opposite party no.7 has been incorrectly issued but admits that the said certificate has not yet been cancelled. 6. In view thereof, liberty is granted to petitioner to pursue his remedy for raising grievance with regard to Income Certificate of opposite party no.7, which shall be considered expeditiously after affording opportunity of hearing to opposite party no.7 as well. 7. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 21.8.2025 Satish Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench