HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9405 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no.1 and Sri Ashish Chaturvedi, learned counsel for respondents no.2 and 3. 2. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally. 3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that subsequent to services of the petitioner being regularized while working as a dailywager and he having retired on 31.12.2019 the respondents have failed to pay the pension and other retiral dues by counting the total length of service rendered by the petitioner as regular service for the purpose of pension. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.3 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels appearing for respondents have no objection. 5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dilip Kumar Pandey, Amit Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Uday Bhan Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. House Planning Development Sectt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) reasoned and speaking order within a further period of eight weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. August 28, 2025 A. Katiyar WRIA No. 9405 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench