VIJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER JUDICIAL, AYODHYA MANDAL, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/4933/2025 · 2025-08-21
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158550 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158550 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49045 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4933 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar And Others Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner Judicial, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No. 1 to decide the pending stay application in Case No. 2090 of 2024 & Computerize Case No. - C202404000002090 (Vijay Kumar and others Vs. Mo. Younus and others) filed U/S 207 of Uttar Pradesh Board of Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid application in a time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Accordingly, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, without entering into the merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner, Judicial, Ayodhya mandal, Ayodhya to consider and decide pending stay application in Case No. 2090 of 2024 & Computerize Case No. - C202404000002090 (Vijay Kumar and others Vs. Mo. Younus and others) filed U/S 207 of Uttar Pradesh Board of Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say, within a period of six weeks from the date sufficiency of service is received with regard to the respondents and in case there is some legal impediment, it shall also be open for the petitioner to press for grant of ad interim relief in case the case is so made out. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 21.8.2025/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench