( 2025:JHHC:17833 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5369 of 2025 ------ 1. Rinku Mahto @ Rinku Nonia @ Adi, aged about 40 years, son of Motilal Mahto, 2. Tiwari Mahto @ Tiwari, aged about 32 years, son of Kulesh Mahto, Both are resident of Gram-Babupur, P.O. + P.S.-Tinpahar, District-Sahebganj, (Jharkhand)-816116. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sudhanshu Shekhar, Advocate : Mr. Devendra Kr. Ray, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 03-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Town) P.S. Case No.757 of 2024 corresponding to Sessions Trial No.153 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 112(2), 303(2), 317(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners files a supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners are the members of gang of mobile phone thieves. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that there is no theft report in respect of mobile phones which have been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. It is also submitted that charge sheet has been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioners have been implicated only on the basis of discloser of statement of co-accused. It is next submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-03 of the supplementary affidavit. It is next submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 31.12.2024 as is evident from para-10 of this bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Session Judge-IV, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Town) P.S. Case No.757 of 2024 corresponding to Sessions Trial No.153 of 2025 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/