HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7733 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Kulbhushan Singh Sikarwar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Satyendra Srivastava, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.59 of 2025, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., registered at Police Station Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 28.02.2025 against five persons, including the applicant, stating that the informant is owner in possession of his agricultural land and the accused persons started claiming ownership in respect of the complainant's land on the basis of a sale deed executed on 16.04.2024 by some imposter. The applicant had witnessed execution of the sale deed. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. It has also been submitted on behalf of the applicant that the co-accused persons Ramesh Kumar & Rais have already been granted bail by this court by means of orders dated 27.06.2025 and 09.09.2025, passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.5726 and 8527 of 2025 respectively. Another co-accused Vikas Singh has already been granted anticipatory bail in the present case by this court by means of an order dated 29.08.2025, passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No.1131 of 2025. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kulbhushan Singh Sikarwar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Satya Narayan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. The learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State has opposed the prayer for bail and he stated that the investigation in the matter is still going on. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant had merely witnessed the execution of sale deed and he was neither the executant nor the beneficiary of the sale deed and there is no allegation that the applicant has received any monetary benefit out of the execution of the sale deed and the complainant has stated in the F.I.R. that he was in possession of the land in question coupled with the fact that the applicant has no previous criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 11.07.2025 and two co-accused persons have been granted bail by this court, whereas another co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail in the present case by this court and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8. Let the applicant-Satya Narayan be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) September 10, 2025 Ram. BAIL No. 7733 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench