[2025:RJ-JP:18553] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5162/2025 Suresh @ Sulya Son Of Banwari Lal, Resident Of Parbani, Police Station Raini, District Alwar. (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui, District Dausa) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5238/2025 Rinku S/o Shri Kripal, R/o Behind Tehsil Reni, Police Station Reni, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (The Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui, District Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5239/2025 1. Ashok @ Rinku S/o Habdu, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Sunari, Police Station Rajgarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan. (Presently In Judicial Custody In Jail At Bandikui). 2. Anil Kumar S/o Habdu, R/o Sunari, Police Station Rajgarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan. (Presently In Judicial Custody In Jail At Bandikui). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5266/2025 Tasleem Son Of Ishrayal Khan, R/o Bairawada, Police Station Rajgarh, District Dausa (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus [2025:RJ-JP:18553] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5162/2025] State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohan Pal Meena Mr. Rajneesh Gupta Mr. G.L. Sharma Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 02/05/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.51/2025 registered at Police Station-Baijupara, District-Dausa for the offences under Section 4/21 of MMDR Act and Sections 189(2), 126(2), 132, 121(1), 303(2) of BNS 2023. Since all these bail applications arise from common order, hence, they are being decided by this single order. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these case. Petitioners are behind the bars since 05.04.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. [2025:RJ-JP:18553] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5162/2025] 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Suresh @ Sulya Son Of Banwari Lal, Rinku S/o Shri Kripal, Ashok @ Rinku S/o Habdu, Anil Kumar S/o Habdu and Tasleem Son Of Ishrayal Khan shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each of them to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. 7. Further, petitioner is directed to mark his presence fortnightly in every month for a period of six months before the SHO Baijupara, District Dausa. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO will immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the Court the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to the petitioner by this Court. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/229-232