Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15853 (JHR)

MAKDASH ANSARI ALIAS MAKDAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4682/2025 · 2025-06-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:15856] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4682 of 2025 ------ Makdash Ansari @ Makdas aged about 21 years, son of Rojeed Ansari, resident of Ward No.10, Village Chhapardaga, P.O. Bhikhahi, P.S. Danda, District Garhwa (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Syed Tafazzul Sajid, Advocate Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Achinto Sen, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 17-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection Ranka P.S. Case No.42 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under 303 (2), 308 (3), 308 (4) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was in possession of pamphlets of an extremist’s organization and he committed theft of the mobile phone of the informant and pasted pamphlets of the extremist’s organization T.S.P.C. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-14 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner is neither named in the F.I.R. nor has he been put on Test Identification Parade. It is also submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 29.03.2025 as is evident from para-16 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Garhwa in connection with Ranka P.S. Case No.42 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/