Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar’s or der w it h Sign at u r es
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS D/19
Modification Application (MCC) No.10 of 2026 In WPMS No.1795 of 2024 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.C. Joshi, Brief Holder for the State/respondent nos.1 to 4. Ms. Zeba Naaz, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Advocate for respondent no.5. The petitioner has filed a modification application. On behalf of the respondent no.5 time is sought to file objections. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the one hand the respondent no.5 is taking time here and on the other hand, he has moved an application to the authority for appointment of an Authorized Controller on the ground that the term of the petitioner has expired. It is argued that, in fact, during that period the petitioner’s Committee was not allowed to work by the authority that time has to be added in their term, which otherwise is going to expire on 15.05.2026. He submits that the State may be directed not to proceed further for appointment of Authorized Controller till the modification application is decided. List on 07.05.2026.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 23.04.2026 Sanjay