Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15850 (CHH)

BRIJ KHANDELWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/913/2019 · 2025-04-28

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:19053 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 913 of 2019 1 - Brij Khandelwal S/o Niranjan Lal Khandelwal Aged About 58 Years R/o 1312, Little India Apartments, 13 Main Road, Anna Nagar (West) Cheennai - 600040 2 - Smt. Raj Khandelwal W/o Brij Khandelwal Aged About 55 Years R/o 1312, Little India Apartments, 13 Main Road, Anna Nagar, (West) Chennai.- 600040 ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police of Police Station Mahila Thana, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Akanksha Khandelwal W/o Ankur Khandelwal Aged About 30 Years R/o House of Radharani Goel, Park Road, Choubey Colony, Raipur, P.S. Saraswati Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Danish Ahmad Siddiqui, Advocate For State : Mr. Swajeet Singh Ubweja, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board Per, Ramesh Sinha, C.J. 28/04/2025 ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.04.29 10:23:09 +0530 2 / 2 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to allow this petition and in the interest of justice: 1. Quash / set-aside the impugned F.I.R. dated 20.12.2018 (Annexure- P/1) vide Crime No.49/2018 registered in Mahila Thana, Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 498A read-with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 against the petitioners. 2. grant any other order(s)/ relief(s) that the Hon’ble Court may be deemed fit & just in the facts & circumstances of the case in favour of petitioners.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been put to trial and they have been acquitted, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice ashu