SEETAPATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. BAL VIKAS EVAM PUSHTAHAR LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/9281/2025 · 2025-08-20
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158491 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 158491 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48646 Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9281 of 2025 Petitioner :- Seetapati Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Bal Vikas Evam Pushtahar Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Girish Chandra Misra,Ram Chandra Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties 1 to 6. In view of the order being passed, notice to opposite party No.7 stands dispensed with. Petition has been filed challenging order dated 23 June 2025, whereby petitioner's representation for challenging appointment of opposite party No. 7 as Anganwadi Worker has been rejected. It has been submitted that during consideration of merit, the post graduation marks of opposite party No.7 have also been taken into account, which was not required to be done. However, since petitioner has erroneously failed to challenge the aforesaid provision of the Government Order dated 21st March 2023, learned counsel for petitioner on the basis of instructions seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh to effect challenge to the specific condition of the said Government Order. In view of such submission being made, petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to file a fresh. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 prabhat Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench